Sunday, April 14, 2013

In re Jordan Schiff case brief

In re Jordan Schiff case brief summary

The Hearing Panel of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (New York) recommended a public censure of respondent attorney. Petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department (committee) filed a motion to confirm the censure.

OVERVIEW: The attorney was unduly intimidating and abusive toward another attorney during a deposition. The attorney directed vulgar, obscene, and sexist epithets toward the attorney's anatomy and gender. The committee recommended public censure.

The court approved the committee's motion because: (1) the attorney had apologized by letter and in person at the disciplinary hearing to the attorney that he had insulted; (2) the attorney was young and inexperienced; (3) the trial judge had imposed monetary sanctions; and (4) the attorney was fired from the law firm at which he had been employed.

The court placed the attorney on notice that a repeat of that type of conduct would warrant a suspension from the practice of law.

OUTCOME: The court granted the committee's motion to confirm the hearing panel's report and recommendation that the attorney was to be publicly reprimanded.

Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?


No comments:

Post a Comment

The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...