Friday, October 10, 2014

Hegel v. Langsam case brief summary


Hegel v. Langsam case brief summary

F: P is contending that D permitted P to the Uniersity, to become associated with criminals, to be seduced, to become a drug user and allowed her to be absent from her dorm and failed to return to her parent’s custody.

I: Whether University has duty of care as to student’s private lives, or to supervise their associations, and failure to do it constitutes a negligence on the part of University. 


R: University has no duty of care as to student’s private lives, or to supervise their associations, and failure to do it does not constitute a negligence on the part of University.

C:
in favor of D

No comments:

Post a Comment

Search Thousands of Case Briefs and Articles.