Morrill v. United States case brief
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
228 F. Supp. 734 (D. Me. 1964)
CASE SYNOPSIS: Plaintiff taxpayers
initiated a tax refund action against defendant government, alleging
that trust income applied to the payment of the tuition and room
charges for the taxpayers' four minor children was not taxable as
income under I.R.C. § 677.
FACTS: The taxpayers established four short-term trusts for the benefit of their four minor children. The trusts provided that during the minority of the children, the trustee could use trust income for payment of room, tuition, books, and travel to and from any private college or school. The children attended private schools and colleges. The taxpayers requested that the trustee pay from the trusts the room and tuition charges on the bill. The taxpayers submitted a joint income tax return and did not include any of the income of the four children's trusts. The government determined a deficiency, claiming that the trust income that had been applied in payment of the children's tuition and room charges was taxable under § 677. The taxpayers initiated a refund action.
FACTS: The taxpayers established four short-term trusts for the benefit of their four minor children. The trusts provided that during the minority of the children, the trustee could use trust income for payment of room, tuition, books, and travel to and from any private college or school. The children attended private schools and colleges. The taxpayers requested that the trustee pay from the trusts the room and tuition charges on the bill. The taxpayers submitted a joint income tax return and did not include any of the income of the four children's trusts. The government determined a deficiency, claiming that the trust income that had been applied in payment of the children's tuition and room charges was taxable under § 677. The taxpayers initiated a refund action.
ANALYSIS:
In entering judgment for the
government, the court found that the trust income was used to satisfy
the taxpayers' legal obligations so that it was taxable as income.
The court held that the trust income was used to defray expenses that
the taxpayers were legally liable. The taxpayers expressly assumed
the responsibility to pay for the expenses and obligated themselves
to pay the children's bills.
CONCLUSION: The court entered judgment in favor of the government.
---
CONCLUSION: The court entered judgment in favor of the government.
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
No comments:
Post a Comment