- Facts: P lived and worked on some land, starting in 1945 (dwelling house and trailer park)…∆ oil refinery opened in 1950, emitted noxious fumes and soot; sickened Ps and other nearby landowners. Ps notified Ds about problems and demanded that they stop.D continued to operate.TC said: Refinery was a nuisance…Box II Liability rule. NC Sup. Ct. affirmed and granted injunctive relief.
- Rule: Lawful conduct which is non-negligent may constitute a nuisance if it is intentional and unreasonable under the circumstances.
- Holding: D is a nuisance per accidens and is thereby enjoined
- Threshold test of substantiality: Does it cross the threshold to substantial harm? If so, then injunction
- Restatement: 2 possible interpretations
- Ordinary person test
- How abnormal the use is (if everyone is doing it, probably not a nuisance)
- Rationale:
- D intentionally and unreasonably released gases and odors to substantially impact the air quality and negatively harm P’s ability to enjoy his private land.
- the injunction was not unreasonable to prevent further continuing harm to the plaintiffs
- “Intentionally…caused noxious gases and odors to escape onto the nine acres of the Ps to such a degree as to impair in a substantial manner the Ps use and enjoyment of their land.”
- Court doesn’t consider whether the costs of shutting down D outweigh the benefits
No comments:
Post a Comment