Tuesday, May 20, 2014
INS v. AP (“Hot News”) case brief summary
F: AP member newspapers feed information into AP. Then made available to all its members. AP had own reporters and photographers as independent newsgathering. News reports published by AP East Coast stolen by rival INS and forwarded to INS’ Midwest and West Coast papers to be published simultaneously or earlier as AP’s local counterparts. Sometimes totally copied, sometimes just took the basic facts.
-Facts are not Copyrightable. Public domain.
-Failure to acknowledge source. Kind of customer deception. Unfair competition.
There is a ‘quasi-property’ right in the dissemination of uncopyrightable information, which is only enforceable against competitors. “Hot news”.
-Beyond the traditional context of ‘passing off’, this case stands for general common property right against ‘misappropriation’ of commercial value (of the fresh news – hot news). Competitive advantage that is illegitimate.
-Temporal limit on injunction.
According to a Forbes article, personal injury lawsuits are civil actions brought by an injured person against the party responsible for the...
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
Corthell v. Summit Thread Company (1933) · Facts: Corthell is a salesman for Summit. He invents contraption that is bought b...
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...