22 P.3d 682 (2001)
The father and appellee mother were partners in a consensual sexual relationship. Allegedly, the mother misrepresented that she was practicing birth control when she was not, and the father unknowingly fathered her child. The father's complaint was limited to compensatory damages for the "economic injury" of supporting a normal, healthy child.
- The appellate court held that the father's complaint was properly dismissed for failure to state a claim because:
- (1) the public policy of child support prevailed; and
- (2) the father's attempt to apply traditional contract and tort principles to his contraceptive agreement was unconvincing and, in the end, futile.
- The court acknowledged that the rules of civil procedure were not expressly clear whether a party could pursue discovery of material that was subject to an ongoing discovery dispute that was not resolved by the parties or decided by the court, so the court concluded that it was unfair to uphold the sanction awarded.
The court affirmed the dismissal order, and reversed the imposition of sanctions.
Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Contract Law
Shop for Law School Course Materials.