660 F.2d 547 (1981)
A jury found that eight appellants participated in a scheme to import marijuana into the United States. A number of those appellants were also convicted of using a telephone to facilitate the commission of a Title 21 violation under 21 U.S.C.S. § 843(b). At trial, an undercover Drug Enforcement Administration agent testified that he received a telephone call from a person who identified himself as one of the coconspirators by using a nickname he had used throughout the investigation. The caller told the agent that he was to obtain a boat. Based on that conversation alone, the agent identified appellant caller as the person with whom he had spoken. The agent also testified that he had never met the caller, and that the conversation was not recorded.
- In reversing the caller's conviction for facilitating a conspiracy through use of a telephone, the court held that the agent's identification was inadmissible because it was not authenticated as required by Fed. R. Evid. 901.
- The court held that a telephone call out of the blue from one who identified himself as a conspirator was not, in itself, sufficient authentication of the call as in fact coming from the conspirator.
The court affirmed the district court jury's verdict that convicted all eight appellants of conspiracy to import marijuana. The court reversed one conviction for using a telephone to facilitate commission of a Title 21 violation because of insufficient evidence and affirmed each of the remaining verdicts and sentencing considerations.
Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Evidence
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.