United States v. Ince case brief summary
21 F.3d 576 (4th Cir. 1994)
CASE FACTS
Defendant challenged his conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon, contending that it was reversible error to admit his alleged confession in order to impeach the credibility of a government witness.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial because it was reversible error to have admitted for impeachment purposes an otherwise inadmissible confession.
Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Evidence
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
21 F.3d 576 (4th Cir. 1994)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Defendant appealed a decision of the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
which convicted him of assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to
do bodily harm.CASE FACTS
Defendant challenged his conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon, contending that it was reversible error to admit his alleged confession in order to impeach the credibility of a government witness.
DISCUSSION
- The court reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial.
- The court considered three factors in determining whether it was highly probable that the admission of the confession affected the conviction:
- (1) the centrality of the issue affected by the error;
- (2) the steps taken to mitigate the effects of the error; and
- (3) the closeness of the case.
- The identification of the defendant was the only controverted evidence in the case and it was probable that the jury was unable to follow the district court's instruction on impeachment by prior inconsistent statement or apply it to the testimony, particularly when the prosecutor in closing argument asked the jury to accept the confession as true.
- Because the tainted evidence was a confession and the first trial ended in a deadlocked jury, the court concluded that the case was sufficiently close that the erroneous admission of defendant's alleged confession was not harmless under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(a).
CONCLUSION
The court reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial because it was reversible error to have admitted for impeachment purposes an otherwise inadmissible confession.
Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Evidence
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment