91 N.Y.2d 554 (1998)
The lower court awarded the pre-zygotes to the former wife and concluded that the former wife had exclusive decisional authority over the fertilized eggs created through the IVF process.
The lower court held that former wife had not waived her right in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) consent, which provided that in the event of unforeseen circumstances, the pre-zygotes were to be retained by the IVF program for research.
The appellate division disagreed and found that the former wife's right to privacy and bodily integrity was not implicated before implantation occurred, and that the former wife was bound by the IVF consent.
- On appeal, the court held that (1) disposition of the pre-zygotes did not implicate the former wife's right of privacy or bodily integrity in the area of reproductive choice, nor were the pre-zygotes recognized as persons for constitutional purposes.
- The court further held that the informed consents signed by the parties unequivocally manifested their mutual intention that under the circumstances the pre-zygotes were to be donated for research to the IVF program.
The court affirmed the order of the appellate division.
Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Contract Law
Shop for Law School Course Materials.