Kimmel’s Estate case brief summary
123 A. 405 (1924)
CASE FACTS
The decedent died suddenly on the afternoon of the same day that he wrote and mailed the letter to two of his children. The letter instructed that if anything happened, the designated property was to go to the two children. The decedent added that they should lock the letter up and that it might help them out. The heir argued that the letter was not testamentary in character and that it was not properly signed as required by law in order to constitute a will.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the decree, which probated the letter, and dismissed the appeal.
Suggested Study Aids For Wills, Trusts & Estate Law
123 A. 405 (1924)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant heir sought
review of a decree of the orphans' court (Pennsylvania), which
directed the register of wills to probate a letter written by the
decedent to two of his children, who were named in it as
beneficiaries.CASE FACTS
The decedent died suddenly on the afternoon of the same day that he wrote and mailed the letter to two of his children. The letter instructed that if anything happened, the designated property was to go to the two children. The decedent added that they should lock the letter up and that it might help them out. The heir argued that the letter was not testamentary in character and that it was not properly signed as required by law in order to constitute a will.
DISCUSSION
- The court held that the letter was testamentary.
- The words if anything happened conditioned the gift and thus strongly supported the idea of a testamentary intent.
- The statement that the letter might help the named distributees out also indicated that the decedent meant to create a testamentary gift.
- Moreover, the decedent appeared to expect an early demise, as evidenced by the letter itself and the fact of his sickness and recent inability to work.
- The court also held that the decedent meant the word "Father" as a completed signature as it was the method employed by the decedent in signing all such letters and was mailed by him as a finished document.
- Thus, his intent to execute was apparent.
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the decree, which probated the letter, and dismissed the appeal.
Suggested Study Aids For Wills, Trusts & Estate Law
No comments:
Post a Comment