Thursday, September 6, 2012

US v. Singer case brief

US v. Singer (8th Cir 1983) 

ISSUE
-Whether Carlos lives at a certain address; prosecutor introduces evidence that landlord sent eviction notice to Carlos at that address.
Hearsay objection – that it’s being introduced for the proof of what it asserts (it says “Carlos, 600 Wilshire,” they’re trying to prove Carlos lives at 600 Wilshire)
HOLDING
-Not hearsay; landlord didn’t intend to assert that Carlos lives there
ANALSYIS
-Landlord meant to start an eviction proceeding – it wasn’t in the front of his mind to assert where Carlos lives
-This is a performative statement – not assertive conduct.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. Montana Case Brief: Key Takeaways for Law Students and Legal Researchers

Case Brief: Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. Montana, 368 P.3d 1131 (Mont. 2016) Court Supreme Court of Montana Citation 368 P.3d 11...