- US v Peterson- While Keitt was attempting to steal windshield wipers from ∆’s car, ∆ went into his house and retrieved a pistol. After warning that he would shoot Keitt if he took another step, Keitt continued to advance toward ∆ and ∆ shot him in the face. ∆ was convicted of manslaughter and appealed, complaining that the judge erred in the jury instruction given w/ respect to his self defense claim.
- One cannot raise a self defense claim if he is the aggressor. In order to claim self defense one must be w/o fault.
- One who is an aggressor in a conflict culminating in death can’t invoke the necessities of self preservation. Only if he communicates a good faith attempt to withdraw may the right of self defense be reinstated.
Case briefs for law students, lawyers, and others researching case law. I created many of these briefs in law school and periodically update them from time to time. My goal has been to build a one stop resource center for law students!
Friday, September 14, 2012
United States v. Peterson case brief
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Full Outline of The Mountain Is You by Brianna Wiest
The Mountain Is You by Brianna Wiest The Mountain Is You by Brianna Wiest is a transformative self-help book that delves into self-sabo...
-
Case Brief: Brisboy v. Fireboard Paper Products Corporation Court: Michigan Supreme Court Citation: 429 Mich. 540, 418 N.W.2d 650 (1988) D...
-
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
-
https://www.pexels.com/photo/coworkers-talking-outside-4427818/ Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...
No comments:
Post a Comment