- State v Abbott- there was a fight b/w Scarano and ∆. A jury could find Scarano as the aggressor. His dad joined the fight armed w/ a hatchet, and his mom w/ a knife. All of the Scarano’s were hit w the hatchet. ∆ claimed that they were hit while struggling for the hatchet. A jury could find that ∆ intentionally inflicted the blows.
- A person has a duty to retreat before using deadly force to defend himself, but he need only retreat where he knows that he can do so w/ complete safety.
- The burden is on the ∆ to produce evidence to support the defense.
- The state has the burden or proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defense is not true.
- One need not retreat before using non-deadly force.
- “No retreat” advocates The manly thing is to hold one’s ground and society should not demand what smacks of cowardice
- You must retreat when you can do so w/ complete safety (believes v. knows degree of confidence)
- When deciding if someone knows it you must look to the totality of the circumstances
- “complete safety”- can you stand your ground and kill if you think that if you run away he will throw a twig at you
Friday, September 14, 2012
State v. Abbott case brief
Earning a Juris Doctor (JD) degree is a significant accomplishment, opening a wide array of career paths beyond the traditional legal practi...
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
Corthell v. Summit Thread Company (1933) · Facts: Corthell is a salesman for Summit. He invents contraption that is bought b...