Sunday, November 29, 2015
Dyer v. Macdougal case brief summary
Dyer v. Macdougal case brief
1952 Ct of Appeals
Facts: A trial judge granted jnov but denied a new trial saying it is his judgment that evidence was insufficient to go to a jury but if he was wrong, does not think a new trial is needed without other errors
Reasoning: First case where the court reversed the trial judge’s decision. The appeals thought that the evidence is overwhelmingly against the plaintiff but even so, jnov was not justified. This is because there was some evidence that the at plaintiff actually was hurt as he claims but because trial judge does not believe it, does not mean jnov should be granted. Also said that trial judge can grant a new trial even WITHOUT any errors. Judge had a misconception that a new trial is granted only if errors are present which is not true.
Check out our eBook: How to Win at Law School to see how to transfer to a top law school, get the top grades in your class, and get a head start on the legal profession!
Image Source Have you ever considered a career where each day offers a new challenge and the chance to make a real difference? Studying cr...
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
Corthell v. Summit Thread Company (1933) · Facts: Corthell is a salesman for Summit. He invents contraption that is bought b...