Saturday, November 28, 2015

Ginsberg v. Williams case brief summary

Ginsberg v. Williams case brief
1965 Minnesota 

Facts: Suit for damages of a car accident; the defendant won in a jury trial with plaintiff moving for a new trial. The court granted the motion in the interests of justice. Defendant moved to stop the new trial under Rule 59 of Minnesota Civ Pro since that sets out the only grounds for a new trial

Reasoning: Minnesota supreme granted because Rule 59 is comprehensive and needs no other reasons. A new trial for a new rule is arbitrary and a review would not be available which is unfair. It is too subjective and should not stand. Too subjective, reversed. 
***

How To Be In the Top 10% of Your Class

Do you want to be in the top 10% of your class?  How about in the top 1%?  

Do you want to transfer to Harvard, Yale, or Stanford?

Do you want almost guaranteed employment?

How do the top law students get there?

It's not that they are smarter than you.

They know how to study.

Are you in the top 10% of your class?

Are you in the top 1% of your class?

Why not?

You could be. 

You have already invested thousands of dollars and time into law school.  Yet, none of this money goes to telling you how to be the top student in your class.  

Want to know how you can be the best?


No comments:

Post a Comment

Search Thousands of Case Briefs and Articles.