Gentry v. Douglas Hereford case brief summary
F: TC ruled in favor of D
D stumbled from the steps and his rifle discharged, and struck P in the head, and P died.
I: whether in situation where P cannot describe what caused her injury, the negligence on the part of D is not a cause of the P’s injury merely because the accident happened on their land.
R: In situation where P cannot describe what caused her injury, the negligence on the part of D is not a cause of the P’s injury merely because the accident happened on their land.
A: P has offered no substantial evidence that any condition on the property caused D to stumble and flal immediately before his
rifle discharged and struck the D.
C: affirmed
F: TC ruled in favor of D
D stumbled from the steps and his rifle discharged, and struck P in the head, and P died.
I: whether in situation where P cannot describe what caused her injury, the negligence on the part of D is not a cause of the P’s injury merely because the accident happened on their land.
R: In situation where P cannot describe what caused her injury, the negligence on the part of D is not a cause of the P’s injury merely because the accident happened on their land.
A: P has offered no substantial evidence that any condition on the property caused D to stumble and flal immediately before his
rifle discharged and struck the D.
C: affirmed
No comments:
Post a Comment