1 N.W.2d 539 (1942)
The carrier contracted with farmers to pick up their milk and deliver it to the receiving corporation. After the carrier refused to sell his route to the receiving corporation and notified the receiving corporation of the written agreements, the receiving corporation took steps to end the carrier's route. The carrier argued that the receiving corporation desired to prevent the carrier from protecting the farmers from the receiving corporation's dishonest business practices by interfering with the contracts. The receiving corporation argued that it took action against the carrier after the carrier failed to timely deliver milk in good condition.
DISCUSSION AND HOLDING
- The court held that:
- (1) the receiving corporation would have been within its legal rights if it had merely refused to accept milk from the carrier;
- (2) the receiving corporation's letters to the farmers showed active solicitation of breach of the contracts;
- (3) when the receiving corporation refused to purchase from the farmers unless they broke their contract with the carrier, the receiving corporation brought about the breach; and
- (4) the refusal to accept deliveries from the carrier was done to accomplish an unlawful purpose.
The court vacated the trial court's entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict and remanded the cause for entry of judgment in favor of the carrier.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.