Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
case brief summary
584 P.2d 15 (1978)
CASE FACTS
The contractor hired the transporter to move construction materials by sea. Numerous problems impeded performance of the contract, and the contractor terminated the contract. The parties settled for a portion of the invoice. The transporter argued that the settlement should be avoided on the grounds of economic duress.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The summary judgment was reversed and remanded.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
584 P.2d 15 (1978)
CASE SYNOPSIS
The Superior Court (Alaska) granted
summary judgment in favor of defendant contractor in an action
brought by plaintiff transporter. The transporter appealed the
judgment.CASE FACTS
The contractor hired the transporter to move construction materials by sea. Numerous problems impeded performance of the contract, and the contractor terminated the contract. The parties settled for a portion of the invoice. The transporter argued that the settlement should be avoided on the grounds of economic duress.
DISCUSSION
- The court held that the trial court erred in denying the transporter's motion to formally publish a witness' deposition after summary judgment was entered because the parties had referred to the deposition in their memoranda and arguments.
- The court further held that summary judgment was not properly granted because the transporter made a sufficient factual showing to withstand the motion for summary judgment as to each of the elements of economic duress by showing that it was the victim of a wrongful threat, and the threat deprived it of its unfettered will.
CONCLUSION
The summary judgment was reversed and remanded.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment