743 So.2d 199 (La. 1999)
Victim told her mother's friend that defendant, victim's grandmother's husband, had touched her in inappropriate areas for years. Defense counsel attempted to cross-examine victim's mother about victim's similar accusations against her cousin. Victim subsequently recanted these accusations. Testimony regarding victim's prior allegations of sexual molestation were barred on basis of the rape shield statute, La. Code Evid. art. 412.
- On appeal, court noted that defendant's conviction rested on trier of fact's credibility determinations because there was no physical evidence of sexual assault in this case.
- Court reasoned that defendant did not seek to introduce evidence of victim's past sexual behavior because he did not attempt to prove victim's prior sexual behavior or unchaste character.
- Thus, defendant's questioning regarding victim's prior false allegations concerning sexual behavior was not barred by rape shield statute.
- Court concluded that trial court's ruling that excluded this testimony was not harmless because jury verdict rested entirely on their perception of victim's veracity.
Judgment reversed and case remanded for new trial. Defendant's right to fair trial was violated when trial court precluded introduction of evidence that affected victim's credibility as a witness. Testimony regarding victim's past false accusations of sexual assault was not barred by the rape shield statute.
Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Evidence
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.