381 P.2d 617 (Wash. 1963)
During his trial on criminal charges, appellant introduced an alibi defense. The alibi witness testified appellant was in another state at the time of the offense. On cross-examination, the witness testified that appellant had been there for the last couple months. Appellee called a rebuttal witness who testified that appellant was in the city where the offense occurred one month prior to the offense. Appellant challenged his conviction claiming error in the admission of the rebuttal testimony because the evidence constituted impeachment on a collateral matter.
- The court agreed and reversed the judgment. Appellant sought to prove he had not been in the city at the time of the offense, not that he had not been there prior to such date.
- Thus, for purposes of impeaching the witness, whether the defendant was in the city on a given occasion one month prior to the offense was irrelevant and collateral.
Court reversed and remanded judgment of conviction where admission of rebuttal testimony was prejudicial error because the evidence constituted impeachment on a collateral matter.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.