Reed v. University of North Dakota and The North Dakota
Association for the Disabled, Inc. case brief summary
589 N.W.2d 880 (1999)
CASE FACTS
Plaintiff student had a national letter of intent and played hockey at defendant university for two years before being injured in a preseason hockey conditioning program. He was severely dehydrated and required one kidney and two liver transplants. Plaintiff sued defendant university for breach of contract, and he contended that defendant association was liable under negligence and in concert claims. Defendants moved for dismissal on the grounds that a Minnesota lawsuit had resolved the matter. The trial court granted summary judgment for defendants and dismissed the case.
DISCUSSION
The court affirmed summary judgment for defendant university and defendant association. Plaintiff student's breach of contract claim against defendant university was barred by res judicata, and defendant association was not liable because it did not act in concert with defendant university.
Suggested law school study materials




Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
589 N.W.2d 880 (1999)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff student appealed from the
decision of the District Court for Grand Forks County, Northeast
Central Judicial District (North Dakota), which dismissed his breach
of contract claim against defendant university, as well as his
negligence and in concert claims against defendant association. After
plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries suffered as a hockey
player, defendants sought summary judgment based on res
judicata.CASE FACTS
Plaintiff student had a national letter of intent and played hockey at defendant university for two years before being injured in a preseason hockey conditioning program. He was severely dehydrated and required one kidney and two liver transplants. Plaintiff sued defendant university for breach of contract, and he contended that defendant association was liable under negligence and in concert claims. Defendants moved for dismissal on the grounds that a Minnesota lawsuit had resolved the matter. The trial court granted summary judgment for defendants and dismissed the case.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, plaintiff contended that the breach of contract claim was not barred by res judicata, because the Minnesota action did not result in a decision on the merits.
- The court disagreed.
- The Minnesota decision unequivocally decided the breach of contract claim against defendant university and was entitled to full faith and credit.
- Claims against defendant association were also properly dismissed, as N.D. Cent. Code § 32-03.2-02 limited joint liability to persons who acted in concert.
- The court declined to broadly construe the statutory "in concert" language to include concurrent negligence.
The court affirmed summary judgment for defendant university and defendant association. Plaintiff student's breach of contract claim against defendant university was barred by res judicata, and defendant association was not liable because it did not act in concert with defendant university.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
No comments:
Post a Comment