Prink v. Rockefeller Center Inc. case brief summary
398 N.E.2d 517 (N.Y. 1979)
CASE FACTS
Plaintiff filed a wrongful death action against defendant and others. Plaintiff appealed from an order of the trial court that directed plaintiff to appear for a further oral examination to answer questions concerning conversations with the decedent pertaining to his seeing a psychiatrist and concerning conversations between plaintiff and decedent's psychiatrist occurring after decedent's death.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The order directing plaintiff to appear for a further oral examination was affirmed because plaintiff could not assert privileges that decedent would not have been able to assert had he survived.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
398 N.E.2d 517 (N.Y. 1979)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff appealed from a judgment of
the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial
Department (New York), which affirmed an order of the trial court
that directed plaintiff to appear for a further oral examination in
plaintiff's wrongful death action.CASE FACTS
Plaintiff filed a wrongful death action against defendant and others. Plaintiff appealed from an order of the trial court that directed plaintiff to appear for a further oral examination to answer questions concerning conversations with the decedent pertaining to his seeing a psychiatrist and concerning conversations between plaintiff and decedent's psychiatrist occurring after decedent's death.
DISCUSSION
- The court held that plaintiff could not refuse to testify concerning her husband's mental state by claiming spousal privilege or physician-patient privilege.
- The appellate court affirmed. Plaintiff appealed.
- The reviewing court held that since decedent himself could not have prevented disclosure of the information sought had he survived, plaintiff, as his personal representative, could not do so in an action brought underN.Y. Est. Powers & Trusts Law § 5-4.1.
- The court found that the circumstances of decedent's death precluded the assertion of the privileges.
CONCLUSION
The order directing plaintiff to appear for a further oral examination was affirmed because plaintiff could not assert privileges that decedent would not have been able to assert had he survived.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment