Sunday, December 1, 2013

Palmer v. Fox case brief

Palmer v. Fox case brief summary
264 N.W. 361 (1936)


CASE SYNOPSIS
Defendant vendee appealed from a judgment of the trial court (Michigan), which found in favor of plaintiff vendor in an action to recover the balance of the purchase price due on a land contract.

CASE FACTS
The vendor sold a subdivision lot to vendee for a price to be paid over a period of five years. The purchase agreement required the vendor to make certain improvements in the subdivision. The improvements were not completed. The vendee failed to make the required payments and the vendor filed suit to recover the balance of the purchase price. The trial court found in favor of the vendor and the vendee appealed.

DISCUSSION

  • On appeal, the vendee contended that the failure to make the improvements was a material breach of the covenant to make improvements, which barred the vendor's recovery. 
  • The court reversed the judgment of the trial court. 
  • The court found that the vendee's covenant to pay and the vendor's covenant to make improvements were concurrent and dependent upon each other. 
  • The court held that the vendor was guilty of a substantial breach of a dependent covenant and thus, could not maintain the action.

CONCLUSION
The court reversed the trial court's judgment in favor of the vendor, without a new trial, and awarded the costs to the vendee.

Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Contract Law

Shop for Law School Course Materials.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Search Thousands of Case Briefs and Articles.