273 P.2d 15 (1954)
Appellant brought an action against respondent to recover a sum allegedly owed to him by the estate of decedent. Appellant alleged that the sum was the reasonable value of services rendered as an attorney for decedent in an action for separate maintenance. The total fee for appellant's services was set forth in a written contract with decedent and the fee was to be paid after trial. At the conclusion of the trial ,but before the signing of findings and judgment, decedent discharged appellant as his attorney. The trial court held that appellant could not recover the reasonable value of his services because compensation for those services was covered by the written contract.
On appeal, the court held that since appellant had completed performance he was entitled to compensation in the amount called for in the contract and still owed to him by decedent for performance rendered.
The court reversed the order holding that appellant could not recover the reasonable value of his services rendered, because appellant had completed performance and was entitled to compensation in the amount called for in the contract.
Suggested law school course materials, hornbooks, and guides for Contract Law
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.