Harper v. Paradise case brief summary
210 S.E.2d 710 (1974)
CASE FACTS
The remaindermen challenged the trial court's judgment that entered a directed verdict on the basis that the successors had superior title to contested land. The successors claimed uninterrupted title from an intervening mortgagee who purchased the property at a sheriff's sale following the foreclosure of a deed given by a life tenant to secure a defaulted loan.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court reversed and found that the security deed contained recitals that should have put the successors on notice of the existence of a misplaced or lost prior unrecorded deed.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
210 S.E.2d 710 (1974)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant remaindermen sought review of
a judgment of the Oglethorpe Superior Court (Georgia) that granted a
directed verdict in favor of appellee successors, whom the trial
court determined held a superior title to the land claimed by the
remaindermen.CASE FACTS
The remaindermen challenged the trial court's judgment that entered a directed verdict on the basis that the successors had superior title to contested land. The successors claimed uninterrupted title from an intervening mortgagee who purchased the property at a sheriff's sale following the foreclosure of a deed given by a life tenant to secure a defaulted loan.
DISCUSSION
- The court noted that prior to the execution of the security deed, the life tenant obtained a prior deed to her for life with remainder in fee simple to her named children, and a subsequent quit claim deed from all but one of the then living heirs of the original grantor.
- The remaindermen claimed the land under the original deed that delivered to the life tenant but was lost or misplaced and was not recorded until 35 years later.
- The court noted that the successors traced their title to the security deed, but did not trace their title back to the original deed granted in 1921.
- The court reversed and held that the purchaser of land from a life tenant could only obtain her interest in the land.
- The court held that recitals contained in the quit claim deed indicated the existence of a misplaced or lost prior unrecorded deed.
CONCLUSION
The court reversed and found that the security deed contained recitals that should have put the successors on notice of the existence of a misplaced or lost prior unrecorded deed.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment