523 F.2d 140 (1975)
Defendants were found guilty of first degree murder, first degree assault, and robbery. Defendants filed a motion requesting a new trial on the ground that the verdict had not been freely assented to by all the jurors. The motion was supported by the affidavits of two jurors, who represented that their verdict was the result of certain "pressures," but the district court found that these affidavits were involuntarily made out of fear and denied the motion for a new trial.
- On appeal, the court held that the findings of the district court were fully supported by the evidence. The court held that the rumors did not qualify as extraneous influences and that the integrity of the court was not put in jeopardy by the spread of such rumors among the jury.
- The court held that there was no prejudice accrued to defendants from the only occurrence which was both legally cognizable and sufficient to impeach the jury verdict, and thus, that there was no abuse of discretion in the district court's refusal to order a new trial.
The court affirmed the order of the district court, which denied defendants' motion for a new trial because no prejudice accrued to defendants from the only occurrence that was both legally cognizable and sufficient to impeach the jury verdict.
Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Evidence
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.