162 N.E. 73 (1928)
- The court held that the issue presented was whether a judgment in an action for specific performance was only a decree in personam against the party who had agreed to convey property, or whether the court in such an action could grant a judgment which operated upon the property itself and resulted in a transfer of the title to a successful party though the defendant failed or refused to obey a command of the judgment directed to him.
- The court concluded that although the court could not by constructive service obtain jurisdiction of the person of seller and could not compel him to obey its decree, the court had the power to make a decree which affected the interests the seller had in property within the state, whether he obeyed the decree or not.
- Accordingly, the court affirmed the decision of the trial court.
The court affirmed the decision of the trial court, which affirmed the trial court's order denying the seller's motion for an order setting aside the service on him of purchaser's complaint seeking specific performance of a land contract.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.