Frimberger v. Anzellotti case brief summary
594 A.2d 1029 (1991)
CASE FACTS
Defendant conveyed property to plaintiff by warranty deed without knowing that the wetlands was filled without a permit and in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22a-28 et seq. The alleged violation was unknown to defendant, was not on the land records and was discovered only after plaintiff attempted to get permission to perform additional improvements to the wetlands area. The trial court awarded plaintiff damages for breach of warranty against encumbrances and innocent misrepresentation of real property.
DISCUSSION
Reversed award of damages to plaintiff for breach of warranty against encumbrances because encumbrances cannot be expanded to include latent conditions on property that violate statutes or government regulations; no innocent misrepresentation of real property was made absent breach of warranty.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
594 A.2d 1029 (1991)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appeal by defendant from the judgment
of the Superior Court in the judicial district of Middlesex
(Connecticut) for plaintiff in an action to recover damages for
breach of warranty against encumbrances in connection with the sale
of real property and for innocent misrepresentation of real
property.CASE FACTS
Defendant conveyed property to plaintiff by warranty deed without knowing that the wetlands was filled without a permit and in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22a-28 et seq. The alleged violation was unknown to defendant, was not on the land records and was discovered only after plaintiff attempted to get permission to perform additional improvements to the wetlands area. The trial court awarded plaintiff damages for breach of warranty against encumbrances and innocent misrepresentation of real property.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, the court reversed, holding that the concept of encumbrances could not be expanded to include latent conditions on property that violates statutes or government regulations.
- In addition, because the warranty of covenant against encumbrances was not violated, no misrepresentation was made.
Reversed award of damages to plaintiff for breach of warranty against encumbrances because encumbrances cannot be expanded to include latent conditions on property that violate statutes or government regulations; no innocent misrepresentation of real property was made absent breach of warranty.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
No comments:
Post a Comment