Young v. Reno case brief summary
114 F.3d 879 (1997)
CASE FACTS
Appellant immigrated to the United States as a child with her adoptive parents. Appellant later petitioned the government for immigration preferences on behalf of her natural siblings, who resided in Hong Kong. Although the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) originally approved the petitions, it subsequently revoked them because it determined that appellant was no longer legally related to her natural siblings for immigration purposes. Appellant challenged the revocation in the lower court, and the lower court granted summary judgment in favor of the INS. Appellant sought review of the lower court's judgment.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the lower court's order which granted the government's summary judgment motion because the Immigration and Naturalization Service did not abuse its discretion by interpreting the Immigration and Nationality Act to preclude appellant from successfully petitioning for immigration preferences on behalf of her biological siblings on the ground that her adoption severed their legal relationship.
Suggested Study Aids and Books
114 F.3d 879 (1997)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant sought review of the order
from the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii granting the
government's summary judgment motion in appellant's suit to challenge
the Immigration and Naturalization Service's revocation of petitions
it had previously approved which appellant had filed on behalf of her
natural siblings.CASE FACTS
Appellant immigrated to the United States as a child with her adoptive parents. Appellant later petitioned the government for immigration preferences on behalf of her natural siblings, who resided in Hong Kong. Although the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) originally approved the petitions, it subsequently revoked them because it determined that appellant was no longer legally related to her natural siblings for immigration purposes. Appellant challenged the revocation in the lower court, and the lower court granted summary judgment in favor of the INS. Appellant sought review of the lower court's judgment.
DISCUSSION
- The court concluded that the lower court properly exercised jurisdiction over the case without imposing any exhaustion requirements.
- The court applied a two-step process for reviewing INS's construction of 8 U.S.C.S. § 1153(a)(4) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, and the decision it reached in this case.
- First, the court concluded that Congress had not spoken on the precise issue.
- Second, the court found that the INS's interpretation was a permissible construction of the statute.
- The INS did not announce a new rule with its decision.
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the lower court's order which granted the government's summary judgment motion because the Immigration and Naturalization Service did not abuse its discretion by interpreting the Immigration and Nationality Act to preclude appellant from successfully petitioning for immigration preferences on behalf of her biological siblings on the ground that her adoption severed their legal relationship.
Suggested Study Aids and Books
No comments:
Post a Comment