Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co. case brief summary
514 U.S. 159 (1995)
CASE FACTS
Petitioner sought review of a judgment that set aside a judgment that respondent infringed on petitioner's trademark, in violation of 15 U.S.C.S. § 1114(1), premised on a holding that a trademark could not be obtained for a color alone.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The judgment setting aside a determination that respondent had infringed petitioner's trademark was reversed because petitioner was able to register a color as a trademark to the extent that it met the ordinary requirements to obtain a trademark.
Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Property Law





514 U.S. 159 (1995)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Petitioner sought review of a judgment
from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which
set aside a district court's judgment that respondent infringed on
petitioner's trademark, in violation of 15 U.S.C.S. § 1114(1),
premised on a holding that a trademark could not be obtained for a
color alone.CASE FACTS
Petitioner sought review of a judgment that set aside a judgment that respondent infringed on petitioner's trademark, in violation of 15 U.S.C.S. § 1114(1), premised on a holding that a trademark could not be obtained for a color alone.
DISCUSSION
- The court held that a color, to the extent it met the ordinary requirements to register a trademark, was registerable.
- The court also held a color could satisfy the part of the statutory definition of a trademark, which required a person to "use" or "intend to use" the mark to identify and distinguish his or her goods, including a unique product, from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source of the goods, even if that source was unknown, 15 U.S.C.S. § 1127.
- The court held, however, that to the extent that a color was functional, the mark would have to be examined to determine if its use as a mark would permit one competitor to interfere with legitimate competition.
- Accordingly, the judgment that held petitioner could not register a color as a trademark was reversed.
CONCLUSION
The judgment setting aside a determination that respondent had infringed petitioner's trademark was reversed because petitioner was able to register a color as a trademark to the extent that it met the ordinary requirements to obtain a trademark.
Recommended Supplements and Study Aids for Property Law
No comments:
Post a Comment