Pond v. Pond case brief summary
678 N.E.2d 1321 (1997)
CASE FACTS
A settlor executed a trust, and the trustee brought an action to modify the trust. The trial court reserved judgment, and the trustee sought review.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court remanded to the trial court to enter a judgment modifying the trust.
Suggested Study Aids For Wills, Trusts & Estate Law
678 N.E.2d 1321 (1997)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff trustee
challenged a judgment of the Worcester Division of the Probate and
Family Court Department (Massachusetts) in an action brought by the
trustee seeking reformation of a trust.CASE FACTS
A settlor executed a trust, and the trustee brought an action to modify the trust. The trial court reserved judgment, and the trustee sought review.
DISCUSSION
- The court remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter a judgment modifying the trust.
- The court held that it, as the state supreme court, had authority to decide the issue of modification of the trust.
- The court held that, due to scrivener's errors in the form of omissions and ambiguities, the declaration of trust failed to give effect to the settlor's intent.
- The settlor's intent was to qualify the trust for the marital tax deduction under § 2056(b)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code.
- Finally, the court found no need to reform the termination provisions of the trust, because the provision regarding the share of the estate going to issue of a child that predeceased the settlor was valid under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 191, § 22.
CONCLUSION
The court remanded to the trial court to enter a judgment modifying the trust.
Suggested Study Aids For Wills, Trusts & Estate Law
No comments:
Post a Comment