Poe v. Ullman case brief summary
367 U.S. 497 (1961)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiffs, doctor and patients, sought
review of the order from the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut,
which ruled that Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53-32, 54-196 (1958),
prohibiting the use of contraceptive devices, was applicable to
married couples.CASE FACTS
The patients and doctor challenged the constitutionality under U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV, the state statute prohibiting the use of contraceptive devices and the giving of medical advice in the use of such devices, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53-32, 54-196 (1958). The state supreme court held that the statutes were applicable to married couples even under a claim that conception would constitute a serious threat to the health or life of the female spouse.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, the Supreme Court held that the mere existence of a state penal statute constituted insufficient grounds to support a federal court's adjudication of its constitutionality in proceedings brought against the state's prosecuting officials if real threat of enforcement was wanting.
- Prosecutors in the state had not prosecuted anyone for violation of the statute, and the patients and the doctor were not in any danger of immediately sustaining some direct injury as the result of its enforcement.
- The Court dismissed the action.
CONCLUSION
The court dismissed the plaintiffs', patients and doctor, claim challenging the constitutionality of statutes prohibiting the use of contraceptive devices.
No comments:
Post a Comment