People v. Ashley case brief summary
267 P.2d 271 (1954)
CASE FACTS
Defendant was convicted of grand theft under Cal. Penal Code §484. Defendant had induced his victims to loan him money based on promises that they would be made part of his company and that the money would go to the construction of a theater. In fact, the money loaned was used to alleviate the financial problems affecting defendant's business.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the conviction because there was sufficient evidence to justify the finding that defendant had acquired the money through false pretenses within the meaning of the penal code.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law
267 P.2d 271 (1954)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Defendant challenged the judgment of
the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), which found
him guilty of grand theft under Cal. Penal Code §484 and denied his
motion for a new trial.CASE FACTS
Defendant was convicted of grand theft under Cal. Penal Code §484. Defendant had induced his victims to loan him money based on promises that they would be made part of his company and that the money would go to the construction of a theater. In fact, the money loaned was used to alleviate the financial problems affecting defendant's business.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, defendant argued that the evidence did not support the conviction of theft and that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial.
- The court held that a promise made without intention to perform was a misrepresentation of a state of mind and thus a misrepresentation of existing fact and was a false pretense within the meaning of Cal. Penal Code §484.
- As such, the evidence justified the finding that defendant had acquired the money with a felonious intent.
- The trial judge did not fail in safeguarding defendant's rights.
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the conviction because there was sufficient evidence to justify the finding that defendant had acquired the money through false pretenses within the meaning of the penal code.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law
No comments:
Post a Comment