California v. Acevedo case brief summary
500 U.S. 565 (1991)
CASE FACTS
Defendant placed a bag in the trunk of a car. Police officers stopped him, opened the trunk, and found marijuana.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The judgment concluding that marijuana found in a paper bag in the trunk of a car should have been suppressed was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure: Examples & Explanations, Sixth Edition
Emanuel Law Outline: Criminal Procedure
500 U.S. 565 (1991)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Defendant pled guilty to possessing
marijuana for sale, but appealed the denial of his motion to suppress
marijuana found in a paper bag in a car's trunk. The Court of Appeal
of California, Fourth Appellate District concluded that the marijuana
should have been suppressed. The State was granted certiorari.CASE FACTS
Defendant placed a bag in the trunk of a car. Police officers stopped him, opened the trunk, and found marijuana.
DISCUSSION
- The Court held that the Fourth Amendment did not require the police to obtain a warrant to open the sack in a movable vehicle simply because they lacked probable cause to search the entire car.
- The same probable cause to believe that a container held drugs allowed the police to arrest the person transporting the container and search it.
- The police had probable cause to believe that the paper bag in the car's trunk contained marijuana and probable cause allowed a warrantless search of the paper bag.
- The Fourth Amendment did not compel separate treatment for an automobile search that extended only to a container within the vehicle.
- The police could search containers found in an automobile without a warrant if their search was supported by probable cause.
CONCLUSION
The judgment concluding that marijuana found in a paper bag in the trunk of a car should have been suppressed was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure: Examples & Explanations, Sixth Edition
Emanuel Law Outline: Criminal Procedure
No comments:
Post a Comment