Thursday, November 14, 2013

Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington case brief

Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington case brief summary
538 U.S. 216 (2003)

Plaintiff limited practice officers (LPOs) sued defendants, the Legal Foundation of Washington and others, challenging the constitutionality of a state rule requiring LPOs to deposit trust funds into interest on lawyers' trust accounts (IOLTA). The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, en banc, affirmed the grant of summary judgment for defendants. The LPOs petitioned for certiorari, which was granted.

The LPOs alleged that Washington's IOLTA program violated the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Under Washington's IOLTA rules, IOLTA funds were only those funds that could not, under any circumstances, earn net interest (after deducting transaction and administrative costs and bank fees) for the client. Without the IOLTA program, the funds would not have produced any net interest for the LPOs.


  • The Court determined that the program was not a regulatory taking, but it could be a per se taking requiring the payment of just compensation. 
  • However, the Court found that just compensation was measured by the net value of the interest that was actually earned by the LPOs and that, by operation of the Washington IOLTA rules, no net interest could have been earned by the money that was placed in the IOLTA accounts. 
  • The LPOs' net loss was zero.
  • Therefore, there was no violation of the Just Compensation Clause, and the LPOs were not entitled to any compensation for the nonpecuniary consequences of the taking of the interest on the deposited funds.
The court affirmed the judgment.

Suggested Study Aids and Books

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...