National Parks and Conservation Association v. Morton case brief
summary
498 F.2d 765 (1974)
CASE FACTS
The park association sued under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.S. § 552, to enjoin appellees from refusing to permit inspection and copying of agency records concerning concessions operated in the national parks. The district court granted summary judgment for appellees on the ground that the information was exempt from disclosure under Exemption 4 of FOIA, 5 U.S.C.S. § 552(b)(4).
DISCUSSION
The court reversed the grant of summary judgment and remanded the action for further proceedings consistent with the court's opinion.
Recommended Supplements for Administrative Law Examples & Explanations: Administrative Law, Fourth Edition
Administrative Law and Process: In a Nutshell (Nutshell Series)
498 F.2d 765 (1974)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant, a national park association,
brought an action under the Freedom of Information Act, 5
U.S.C.S. § 552, seeking to enjoin appellees, officials of the
Department of the Interior, from refusing to permit inspection and
copying of records concerning concessions operated in the national
parks. The association sought review of an order from the United
States District Court for the District of Columbia granting summary
judgment to appellees.CASE FACTS
The park association sued under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.S. § 552, to enjoin appellees from refusing to permit inspection and copying of agency records concerning concessions operated in the national parks. The district court granted summary judgment for appellees on the ground that the information was exempt from disclosure under Exemption 4 of FOIA, 5 U.S.C.S. § 552(b)(4).
DISCUSSION
- The issue was whether the information was confidential.
- The court held that appellees had no apparent interest in preventing disclosure of the matter.
- Disclosure of the material to the park association was a mandatory condition of appellees' right to operate in national parks.
- The record did not support application of the financial information exemption.
- The case was remanded to determine whether public disclosure of the information posed the likelihood of substantial harm to the competitive positions of the parties from whom the information had been obtained.
The court reversed the grant of summary judgment and remanded the action for further proceedings consistent with the court's opinion.
Recommended Supplements for Administrative Law Examples & Explanations: Administrative Law, Fourth Edition
Administrative Law and Process: In a Nutshell (Nutshell Series)
No comments:
Post a Comment