United States v. Olin
Corp. case brief
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
107 F.3d 1506 (11th Cir. 1997)
CASE SYNOPSIS: Appellant
government sought review of the order from the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Alabama, which dismissed
appellant's complaint brought under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act against appellee
corporation for pollution located on appellee's property.
FACTS: Appellee corporation operated a chemical manufacturing plant. The plant produced commercial chemicals that contaminated corporate property. Groundwater and soil pollution at the site made it unfit for future residential use. Appellant government brought an action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) against appellee for pollution on the property. The district court dismissed the action. Appellant sought review.
DISCUSSION
FACTS: Appellee corporation operated a chemical manufacturing plant. The plant produced commercial chemicals that contaminated corporate property. Groundwater and soil pollution at the site made it unfit for future residential use. Appellant government brought an action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) against appellee for pollution on the property. The district court dismissed the action. Appellant sought review.
DISCUSSION
- The court reversed the district court and remanded the matter.
- The court found that the district court's U.S. Const. art. 1§ 8, Commerce Clause, analysis conflicted with the proper standard.
- The court concluded that the statute was valid as applied in this case because it regulated a class of activities that substantially affects interstate commerce.
- The court held that CERCLA constituted a permissible exercise of Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause.
- The court noted that CERCLA's purpose, as evinced by the statute's structure and legislative history, also supported the view that Congress intended the statute to impose retroactive liability for environmental cleanup.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
No comments:
Post a Comment