FTC v. Standard Oil
Company of California case brief
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
449 U.S. 232, 101 S. Ct.
488, 66 L. Ed. 2d 416 (1980)
CASE SYNOPSIS: Petitioner
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) appealed from an order from the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which held that the
FTC's complaint issued to respondent oil company for violating the
Federal Trade Commission Act § 5, 15 U.S.C.S. § 45, was a final
agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.S. §
704. The FTC challenged the judicial review of the complaint before
the conclusion of the adjudication.
FACTS: The case was remanded for a dismissal of the FTC's complaint because, under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.S. § 704, the company was not entitled to judicial review of a complaint issued by the FTC before the administrative adjudication was concluded. The court reversed the order of the appellate court that held the issuance of the complaint by the FTC was a final agency action subject to judicial review. The FTC had issued a complaint against the company for violations of § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (Act), 15 U.S.C.S. § 45. The company then sought judicial review, because the complaint was issued without reason to believe that the company was violating the Act. The court held that the issuance of the complaint by the FTC was not a definitive ruling or regulation. The complaint had no legal force or practical effect upon the company's daily business. The company was not entitled to seek judicial review before the administrative adjudication was concluded.
CONCLUSION: The court reversed the order of the appellate court.
FACTS: The case was remanded for a dismissal of the FTC's complaint because, under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.S. § 704, the company was not entitled to judicial review of a complaint issued by the FTC before the administrative adjudication was concluded. The court reversed the order of the appellate court that held the issuance of the complaint by the FTC was a final agency action subject to judicial review. The FTC had issued a complaint against the company for violations of § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (Act), 15 U.S.C.S. § 45. The company then sought judicial review, because the complaint was issued without reason to believe that the company was violating the Act. The court held that the issuance of the complaint by the FTC was not a definitive ruling or regulation. The complaint had no legal force or practical effect upon the company's daily business. The company was not entitled to seek judicial review before the administrative adjudication was concluded.
CONCLUSION: The court reversed the order of the appellate court.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
No comments:
Post a Comment