Bell v. State case brief
761 S.W.2d 847
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
CASE SYNOPSIS: Defendant
appealed a judgment from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Montgomery
County (Texas), which convicted him of cruelty to animals for
knowingly and intentionally torturing a puppy by amputating its
ears.
FACTS: Defendant was convicted of cruelty to animals for knowingly and intentionally torturing a puppy. At trial, defendant did not challenge the information, either as a defective complaint or information, or upon any jurisdictional issue. On appeal, defendant argued the information was fatally defective because the complaint was not sworn to by a person authorized to do so by law. The reviewing court affirmed defendant's conviction, holding that defendant waived his right, if he had any, to complain for the first time on appeal of any defect, error, or irregularity of either form or substance in the information. Hence, defendant's point of error was overruled and the judgment was affirmed.
CONCLUSION: The reviewing court affirmed defendant's conviction, holding that defendant failed to challenge the information at trial. Therefore, defendant was precluded from arguing on appeal that the complaint was fatally defective because he had waived his right to complain for the first time on appeal of any defect in the information.
FACTS: Defendant was convicted of cruelty to animals for knowingly and intentionally torturing a puppy. At trial, defendant did not challenge the information, either as a defective complaint or information, or upon any jurisdictional issue. On appeal, defendant argued the information was fatally defective because the complaint was not sworn to by a person authorized to do so by law. The reviewing court affirmed defendant's conviction, holding that defendant waived his right, if he had any, to complain for the first time on appeal of any defect, error, or irregularity of either form or substance in the information. Hence, defendant's point of error was overruled and the judgment was affirmed.
CONCLUSION: The reviewing court affirmed defendant's conviction, holding that defendant failed to challenge the information at trial. Therefore, defendant was precluded from arguing on appeal that the complaint was fatally defective because he had waived his right to complain for the first time on appeal of any defect in the information.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
No comments:
Post a Comment