Sunday, April 28, 2013

Hauck v. Crawford case brief

Hauck v. Crawford case brief summary
62 N.W.2d 92

CASE SYNOPSIS: Defendants, purported mineral rights owners, sought review of a judgment from the McPherson County Circuit Court (South Dakota) entered in favor of plaintiff property owner in the property owner's quiet title action.

FACTS: Three men approached the property owner concerning an oil and gas lease. The property owner agreed to enter into a lease and he signed the purported lease forms that were prepared by the men. One of the documents was in fact a mineral deed that granted one-half of the minerals in the land to the grantee of the deed. Thereafter, the grantee conveyed his interest to the purported mineral rights owners. The property owner filed a quiet title action, and the trial court entered judgment in favor of the property owner, and found that the property owner signed the deed by fraud in the execution. Thus, the deed was void and did not transfer anything to the grantee. The mineral rights owners appealed and the court reversed the trial court's judgment.

The grantee could not avoid the fraud by asserting negligence on the property owner's part in signing the deed. However, the mineral rights owners were bona fide purchasers.

Thus, if the property owner was negligent or committed acts sufficient to create an estoppel, he should bear the brunt of the negligence. Further, the mineral rights owners did not have the opportunity to plead estoppel because the action was a quiet title action.

CONCLUSION: The court reversed the trial court's judgment.

Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?


No comments:

Post a Comment

Landmark Personal Injury Lawsuits and Their Lasting Impact

According to a Forbes article, personal injury lawsuits are civil actions brought by an injured person against the party responsible for the...