Bias v. Advantage International, Inc.
case brief
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
905 F.2d 1558
CASE SYNOPSIS: Plaintiff estate of
deceased basketball player filed an action against defendants,
company advisor of the player and the particular representative to
the player, for failure to obtain a life insurance policy on the
player and failure to finalize a contract between the player and a
company prior to the player's death. The United States District Court
for the District of Columbia granted summary judgment to defendants.
The estate appealed.
FACTS: The district court held that the estate did not suffer any damage from defendants' alleged failure to obtain life insurance for the player. The district court concluded that defendants could not be held liable for failing to produce a finished endorsement contract before the player's death because defendants had no independent reason to expedite the signing of the endorsement contract to the extent argued by the estate. On appeal, the court affirmed the decision of the district court.
FACTS: The district court held that the estate did not suffer any damage from defendants' alleged failure to obtain life insurance for the player. The district court concluded that defendants could not be held liable for failing to produce a finished endorsement contract before the player's death because defendants had no independent reason to expedite the signing of the endorsement contract to the extent argued by the estate. On appeal, the court affirmed the decision of the district court.
HOLDING:
The court held that the estate was not
entitled to reach the jury merely on the supposition that the jury
might not believe defendants' witnesses.
ANALYSIS:
Because the estate failed to do more
than show that there was some metaphysical doubt as to the material
facts, the district court properly concluded that there was no
genuine issue of material fact as to the insurability of the player,
a drug user. The court held that neither the language of the
representation agreement between the player and defendants nor any
other evidence could support a finding that defendants breached any
duty to the player by failing to push to obtain a signed contract on
the day of negotiations prior to the player's death.
CONCLUSION: The court affirmed the district court's award of summary judgment in favor of defendants.
CONCLUSION: The court affirmed the district court's award of summary judgment in favor of defendants.
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
No comments:
Post a Comment