International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice & Light Co. case brief summary
277 S.W. 631
SYNOPSIS: Plaintiff seller appealed from a judgment of the Ninth District Montgomery County Court of Civil Appeals (Texas) in favor of defendant buyer in a breach of contract action.
OVERVIEW:
-The seller made a written offer to sell water purification equipment to the buyer.
-The offer stated it would become a contract when accepted by the buyer and approved by the seller's executive officer.
-The offer also indicated that, unless promptly accepted, it was subject to change.
-The buyer's manager sent an immediate acceptance to the seller.
-After the seller endorsed the acceptance and requested a water sample from the buyer prior to shipping the equipment, the buyer attempted to "countermand" its order.
-The seller insisted upon performance.
-The buyer prevailed at trial.
-The intermediate appellate court affirmed.
HOLDING:
The express terms of the contract made clear that a notice of approval was not required to complete the contractual relationship.
ANALYSIS:
Because the terms were not ambiguous and did not need further interpretation, the court declined to resort to deducing such a requirement from the terms of the "last quoted clause." Therefore, the seller's offer became an enforceable contract as soon as the buyer accepted according to the offer's definitely expressed terms.
RULES:
-Where a person in an offer made by him to another person, expressly or impliedly intimates a particular mode of acceptance as sufficient to make the bargain binding, it is only necessary for the other person to whom such offer is made to follow the indicated method of acceptance.
-If the person making the offer, expressly or impliedly intimates in his offer that it will be sufficient to act on the proposal without communicating acceptance of it to himself, performance of the condition is a sufficient acceptance without notification.
OUTCOME: Judgment reversed on the grounds that the buyer accepted the seller's offer when one of its executive officers approved the offer, which was the manner of acceptance required by the offer.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
277 S.W. 631
SYNOPSIS: Plaintiff seller appealed from a judgment of the Ninth District Montgomery County Court of Civil Appeals (Texas) in favor of defendant buyer in a breach of contract action.
OVERVIEW:
-The seller made a written offer to sell water purification equipment to the buyer.
-The offer stated it would become a contract when accepted by the buyer and approved by the seller's executive officer.
-The offer also indicated that, unless promptly accepted, it was subject to change.
-The buyer's manager sent an immediate acceptance to the seller.
-After the seller endorsed the acceptance and requested a water sample from the buyer prior to shipping the equipment, the buyer attempted to "countermand" its order.
-The seller insisted upon performance.
-The buyer prevailed at trial.
-The intermediate appellate court affirmed.
HOLDING:
The express terms of the contract made clear that a notice of approval was not required to complete the contractual relationship.
ANALYSIS:
Because the terms were not ambiguous and did not need further interpretation, the court declined to resort to deducing such a requirement from the terms of the "last quoted clause." Therefore, the seller's offer became an enforceable contract as soon as the buyer accepted according to the offer's definitely expressed terms.
RULES:
-Where a person in an offer made by him to another person, expressly or impliedly intimates a particular mode of acceptance as sufficient to make the bargain binding, it is only necessary for the other person to whom such offer is made to follow the indicated method of acceptance.
-If the person making the offer, expressly or impliedly intimates in his offer that it will be sufficient to act on the proposal without communicating acceptance of it to himself, performance of the condition is a sufficient acceptance without notification.
OUTCOME: Judgment reversed on the grounds that the buyer accepted the seller's offer when one of its executive officers approved the offer, which was the manner of acceptance required by the offer.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
No comments:
Post a Comment