Grotts v. Zahner case brief summary
989 P.2d 415 (Nev. 1999)
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Appellant, fiance of person fatally injured in an accident, challenged decision of Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County (Nevada) dismissing her claim of bystander emotional distress against respondent.
FACTS:
-Appellant, Kellie Grotts ("Grotts"), and her fiance were involved in an
accident with respondent Gertrude Zahner ("Zahner").
-Grotts commenced
her action below against Zahner seeking "bystander" emotional distress
damages in connection with fatal injuries sustained by her fiance in the
accident.
-The district court dismissed her claim of bystander emotional
distress on the ground that she was not, as a matter of law, "closely
related" to her fiance for these purposes. Grotts appeals.
HOLDING: The court concluded that in claims for bystander emotional distress, immediate family members of the victim qualified for standing to bring negligent infliction of emotional distress claims as a matter of law.
ANALYSIS:
-When the family relationship between the victim and the bystander was beyond the immediate family, the fact finder was to assess the nature and quality of the relationship and, therefrom, determine as a factual matter whether the relationship was close enough to confer standing.
-This latter category represented the "few close cases" where standing would be determined as an issue of fact.
-The court held that any non-family "relationship" failed, as a matter of law, to qualify for negligent infliction of emotional distress standing.
-Because appellant was not a member of the decedent's family by blood or marriage, she did not have standing to bring an action for bystander emotional distress.
OUTCOME: Decision affirmed because as a non-family member, appellant did not have standing to bring bystander emotional distress claim as a matter of law.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
-->
The best place for complete law school case briefs and law-related news. Want to advertise or post sponsored content? contact us at mrmetropolitan@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Ins and Outs of Class Action Lawsuits: A Comprehensive Guide
Sometimes, you may buy a product only to find it defective. To make it worse, your search for the product reveals mass complaints. You can ...
-
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
-
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
-
Case Brief: Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. 489 U.S. 141 (1989) Facts: In this case, Bonito Boats, Inc. (Bonito) and Thunder...
No comments:
Post a Comment