United States v. Jones case brief summary
132 S. Ct. 945
SYNOPSIS:
132 S. Ct. 945
SYNOPSIS:
-Defendant was charged with drug conspiracy under 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841 and 846. A district court denied in part defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained through a global-positioning-system (GPS) device under the Fourth Amendment.
-A jury returned a guilty verdict.
-The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the conviction and denied the Government's petition for rehearing en banc. Certiorari was granted.
FACTS:
FACTS:
-Defendant came under suspicion of trafficking in narcotics.
-Agents installed a GPS tracking device on the undercarriage of a vehicle registered to defendant's wife while it was parked in a public parking lot.
-Over the next 28 days, the Government used the device to track the vehicle's movements.
-The Government conceded noncompliance with a warrant that had been obtained.
-The appellate court found that admission of the evidence obtained by warrantless use of the GPS device violated the Fourth Amendment.
HOLDING:
HOLDING:
-The U.S. Supreme Court determined that the Government's installation of the GPS device on defendant's vehicle, and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle's movements, constituted a "search."
ANALYSIS:
ANALYSIS:
-Under the common-law trespassory test, the Government physically occupied private property for the purpose of obtaining information.
-Such a physical intrusion would have been considered a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when it was adopted.
-Defendant possessed the vehicle at the time the Government trespassorily inserted the information-gathering device.
-The Government forfeited its alternative argument that officers had reasonable suspicion and probable cause.
OUTCOME: The Court affirmed the appellate court's judgment. 9-0 Decision; 2 Concurrences.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
OUTCOME: The Court affirmed the appellate court's judgment. 9-0 Decision; 2 Concurrences.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
No comments:
Post a Comment