447 A.2d 17
This case was brought for summary judgement.
A stockholder brought a derivative action.
The plaintiff alleged that there was vote buying and corporate waste of assets.
The defendant argued that the plaintiff had no standing to bring suit.
The defendant also argued that there was no factual basis for a waste claim.
-The Plaintiff alleged that the transaction constituted vote-buying and was, as a result, void.
-The Plaintiff also contended that the loan was a corporate waste.
-The Defendant argued that there was no showing of waste here, and that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring the suit because, at the time the suit was commenced, he was not a stockholder.
The court stated, as a result, he had standing to maintain the derivative suit.
-Additionally, the court found that vote-buying was not illegal per se.
-If object or purpose of vote buying is to defraud or in some way disenfranchise the other stockholders, then vote buying is illegal.
-The Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was denied.
-The transaction was permeated by vote-buying and was therefore void.
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?