Baker v. Carr case summary
369 U.S. 186 (1962)
Constitutional Law
PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Plaintiffs sought review of a decision from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee granting defendants' motion to dismiss their complaint, which alleged that a state statute arbitrarily appointed representatives without any reference to any logical formula, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
FACTS:
-Plaintiffs, residents of several counties, filed a complaint against defendants, state officers and election officials, alleging that a state statute arbitrarily and capriciously appointed representatives without reference to any logical or rational formula and that it deprived them of the equal protection of the laws in violation of U.S. Const. amend. XIV.
-The trial court granted defendants' motion to dismiss, finding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction and that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
-The court reversed and remanded, holding that the complaint's allegations of a denial of equal protection presented a justiciable constitutional cause of action upon which plaintiffs were entitled to a trial and a decision.
ANALYSIS:
-The right that plaintiffs asserted was within the reach of judicial protection under U.S. Const. amend. XIV.
-The court further found that if discrimination were sufficiently shown, the right to relief under the Equal Protection Clause would not be diminished by the fact that the discrimination related to political rights.
CONCLUSION: The decision dismissing plaintiffs' complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted was reversed and remanded because the complaint's allegations of a denial of equal protection presented a justiciable constitutional cause of action upon which plaintiffs were entitled to a trial and a decision.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
369 U.S. 186 (1962)
Constitutional Law
PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Plaintiffs sought review of a decision from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee granting defendants' motion to dismiss their complaint, which alleged that a state statute arbitrarily appointed representatives without any reference to any logical formula, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
FACTS:
-Plaintiffs, residents of several counties, filed a complaint against defendants, state officers and election officials, alleging that a state statute arbitrarily and capriciously appointed representatives without reference to any logical or rational formula and that it deprived them of the equal protection of the laws in violation of U.S. Const. amend. XIV.
-The trial court granted defendants' motion to dismiss, finding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction and that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
-The court reversed and remanded, holding that the complaint's allegations of a denial of equal protection presented a justiciable constitutional cause of action upon which plaintiffs were entitled to a trial and a decision.
ANALYSIS:
-The right that plaintiffs asserted was within the reach of judicial protection under U.S. Const. amend. XIV.
-The court further found that if discrimination were sufficiently shown, the right to relief under the Equal Protection Clause would not be diminished by the fact that the discrimination related to political rights.
CONCLUSION: The decision dismissing plaintiffs' complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted was reversed and remanded because the complaint's allegations of a denial of equal protection presented a justiciable constitutional cause of action upon which plaintiffs were entitled to a trial and a decision.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
No comments:
Post a Comment