Friday, November 16, 2012

Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, Inc. case brief

Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, Inc. 

FACTS
P, who is Black, is attending a luncheon at the Brass Ring Club, located in D hotel. As P is standing in line waiting for his food, one of D’s employees snatches the plate from P’s hand, and shouts that because P is Black, he cannot be served in the club. P is not actually touched, nor is he frightened. He is, however, highly embarrassed.

ISSUE
-Is there a tort claim? 

HOLDING
Yes, here P has suffered a battery. “The intentional snatching
of an object from one’s hand is as clearly an offensive invasion of his
person as would be an actual contact with his body.” Furthermore, P can
recover compensatory damages for his mental suffering, even though there
was no physical injury.

ANALYSIS
-The plaintiff need not be aware: It is not necessary that the plaintiff have actual
awareness of the contact at the time it occurs. (Example: D kisses P while she
is asleep. D has committed a battery.)

-Scope of harm: If you put a course of harm into motion, you are responsible
for all the harms to that person regardless of foreseeability.

---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads

https://www.pexels.com/photo/coworkers-talking-outside-4427818/ Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...