Lehr v. Robertson case brief summary
463 U.S. 248 (1983)
CASE SYNOPSIS:On writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York, appellant
putative father sought review of an order affirming the dismissal of the
father's paternity petition and entering an order of adoption in favor
of appellees, mother and stepfather. The putative father claimed a right to notice and an opportunity to be heard pursuant to the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, U.S. Const. amend. XIV.
OVERVIEW: The putative father lived with the mother before the birth of a daughter, who was born out of wedlock. The putative father failed to enter his name in the State of New York's "putative father registry," which would have triggered notice to him of pending adoption proceedings.
HOLDING:
The Supreme Court found that he never had any significant custodial, personal, or financial relationship with the child and that he waited two years to establish a legal tie.
ANALYSIS:
-The Court held that the State of New York adequately protected the putative father's inchoate interest in establishing a relationship with his daughter through the provision of laws authorizing formal marriage, through its statutory adoption scheme, and through the putative father registry.
-Further, it concluded that the Equal Protection Clause did not prevent a state from according two parents different legal rights where one had a continuous custodial responsibility for the child, while the other never established a relationship.
-In that neither the Due Process Clause or the Equal Protection Clause was found to support the putative father's claims, the judgment of the New York Court of Appeals was affirmed.
OUTCOME: The Court affirmed the judgment of the New York Court of Appeals, which held that the putative father was not denied a right to notice and an opportunity to be heard.
Case briefs for law students, lawyers, and others researching case law. I created many of these briefs in law school and periodically update them from time to time. My goal has been to build a one stop resource center for law students!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. Montana Case Brief: Key Takeaways for Law Students and Legal Researchers
Case Brief: Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. Montana, 368 P.3d 1131 (Mont. 2016) Court Supreme Court of Montana Citation 368 P.3d 11...
-
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
-
https://www.pexels.com/photo/coworkers-talking-outside-4427818/ Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...
-
Small Business Tax Tips: Maximizing Deductions and Credits https://pixabay.com/photos/money-bills-calculator-to-save-256312/ Managing a sma...
No comments:
Post a Comment