Sunday, September 16, 2012
Belle Terre v. Boraas case brief
Case: Belle Terre v. Boraas (US 1974).
1. Facts: 6 SUNY Stony Brook students, living in a group house in Belle Terre, challenge the city's zoning ordinance, which states that; if people are related, an unlimited number of them can live together on a property; if people are unrelated; then only 2 can live together.
a. Sup. Ct. upholds the law.
b. The law doesn't evidence an obvious prejudice against unrelated persons as up to 2 can live together.
c. Applied traditional rational, relationship test; eg. The ct. assumes the law is valid & P must overcome that presumption.
3. Justice Marshall's dissent:
a. The classification violates a fundamental right; the right to privacy & freedom of association; therefore, he would apply strict scrutiny.
b. The 1st A. protects the students right to assembly, which the state is now violating.
Earning a Juris Doctor (JD) degree is a significant accomplishment, opening a wide array of career paths beyond the traditional legal practi...
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
Corthell v. Summit Thread Company (1933) · Facts: Corthell is a salesman for Summit. He invents contraption that is bought b...