Sunday, April 1, 2012

Regina v. Cunningham case brief

Regina v. Cunningham

FACTS
Man ripped gas meter out of wall in basement of a house, inadvertently releasing
noxious fumes and threatening the life of the resident. Statute says that ∆ is guilty of
poisoning if he acted “unlawfully and maliciously” to emit the gas.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY
-Trial court judge instructed the jury that maliciously means “wickedly,” but ∆ appealed on the grounds that
-Mens Rea must apply to both actions: stealing the gas meter (money) and releasing the
-gas. Appeals judge ruled that jury instructions were faulty.

RULES
-MENS REA must apply to all actions.
-P must prove that defendant acted in such that either:
1) s/he realizes is wanton and reckless or (reckless)
2) could reasonably be foreseen to cause such an outcome by a reasonable person (negligence).

Note: This principle contradicts the felony murder rule.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Ins and Outs of Class Action Lawsuits: A Comprehensive Guide

Sometimes, you may buy a product only to find it defective. To make it worse, your search for the product reveals mass complaints. You can ...